Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Books / Law / Professional & Technical

[DOWNLOAD] "Annie Alukonis v. Arthur J. Kashulines &" by Supreme Court of New Hampshire " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Annie Alukonis v. Arthur J. Kashulines &

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Annie Alukonis v. Arthur J. Kashulines &
  • Author : Supreme Court of New Hampshire
  • Release Date : January 03, 1950
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 59 KB

Description

Although there must be a new trial for reasons hereinafter stated, the Court correctly denied the defendants' motions for a nonsuit and directed verdict. Upon the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury could find that she and her predecessors in title had fenced in the disputed two rod strip of land along the southerly boundary of her property, cultivated it and in general exercised open, undisputed and frequent dominion over it for thirty-five years whenever the occasion arose. This use during this entire period was sufficient to give the plaintiff title. Jean v. Arsenault, 85 N.H. 72, 74, 75; Gowen v. Swain, 90 N.H. 383, 386; Pease v. Whitney, 78 N.H. 201. However, the defendants claim that the plaintiff may not tack the possession of her predecessors because the deeds in her chain of title do not include the strip in question, and cite authority in support of this proposition. It is significant that among the authorities cited, including both 46 A. L. R. 792, 793; and 1 Am. Jur., Adverse Possession, s. 156, and 1949 Supp., it is stated that the rule forbidding tacking under these circumstances is ""very sharply limited"" to cases where only the deed is relied on ""and there is no circumstance showing an intent to transfer the possession of any property beyond the calls of the deed."" In the case before us there was evidence the plaintiff was shown the bounds, which included the two rod tract, by her predecessor in title and that this tract had been inclosed and cultivated for many years by the plaintiff and her predecessors. This appears sufficient to support the plaintiff's right to tack. Wishart v. McKnight, 178 Mass. 356; 2 C. J. S., Adverse Possession, s. 131. See also, Hoban v. Bucklin, 88 N.H. 73, 85, and authorities cited.


Ebook Download "Annie Alukonis v. Arthur J. Kashulines &" PDF ePub Kindle